GammaTenStripEnvelopeConst #
Ported from scottnarmstrong/Superdiffusion at 7f20476385d4af418f110303085ad0740c9eba46. Module imports, support namespace and local option directives adapted for Lean Pool.
The interior-mesh Besov envelope with the depth input carrying a constant #
ABK26, Step 2 of l.approximate.recurrence.formula,
e.lower.bound.oscillations, e.nablaw.oscillations.
The gap this module fills #
The interior route of Closure.GammaTenStripEnvelope reads the per-depth input
at exactly cgamma^{16} (1+i) 3^{-i} and returns the grid fourth-moment root
at exactly cgamma^{15}, at one and the same cgamma. Both numbers are
rigid, and the consumer of the envelope does not read the depth endpoints at
those numbers:
- the Besov tower the closure's
hoscis stated at is the tower of the gaugedbfF_z, which bycubeBesovPositiveVectorPartialSeminormTwo_gauged_localizationFz_potentialand..._fluxis a fixed scalar multiple of the tower of the raw field; and - the flux leg's raw field is
neumannFluxField = grad w_N + streamForcing, whose oscillation cell exceeds that ofgrad w_Nby the forcing term ofClosure.GammaTenInteriorMinkowski.meshOscillationCell_neumannFluxField_le, again a bounded multiple.
Neither multiple can be pushed through the proved statement: rescaling cgamma
moves premise and conclusion together (a factor A >= 1 in the premise costs
A^{15/16} in the conclusion, in the wrong direction), so the summation has to
be re-run with the constant carried. That is all this module does.
What is proved #
sum_depth_fold_const_le--- the depth fold of the interior route with the constantAcarried: a per-depth input2 (A cgamma^{16} (1+i) 3^{-i})^4folds to200 A^4 cgamma^{64}, uniformly in the depth cutoff. The interior route's own fold closes with the numerical step200 cgamma^{64} <= cgamma^{60}; here that step is omitted rather than applied, so that the caller chooses the budget.exists_besovEnvelope_interiorMesoCubeGrid_of_depth_gridRoot_const--- the envelope itself: from a per-depth grid fourth-moment root belowA cgamma^{16} (1+i) 3^{-i}and the explicit budget premise200 A^4 cgamma^{64} <= c^4, a nonnegative sample familyB, inL^4at every cell ofinteriorMesoCubeGrid d K n outer, dominating every finite-depth positiveq = 2Besov seminorm ofUat exponentgammaTenBesovExponentalmost surely, whose grid fourth-moment root is belowc.
At A = 1, c = cgamma^{15} and 0 < cgamma <= 1/4 the budget premise reduces
to 200 cgamma^{64} <= cgamma^{60}, so the interior route's own endpoint is the
special case; nothing is weakened.
Binders #
Those of the proved composite --- the scale bookkeeping K = n + p, outer + 1 = n + g, g <= p, n <= outer, the boundary gate d 3^{g-p} <= 1/2, the
three cellwise typing binders and the per-depth input --- with the quarter
bound on cgamma and its positivity removed (the fold no longer performs a
numerical step in cgamma) and the two numerical parameters A, c added,
the second nonnegative and tied to the first by hbudget. Nothing about the
corrector, the coefficient field or the sample space occurs: U is an
arbitrary sample-indexed field and mu an arbitrary measure.
Scope #
Internal Provider infrastructure for the Step-2 fluctuation estimate. There is
no sorry, no admit, no custom axiom and no set_option maxHeartbeats.
References #
- ABK26,
l.approximate.recurrence.formulaStep 2,e.lower.bound.oscillations,e.nablaw.oscillations,e.recurrence.params.
The depth fold with a constant carried #
The depth fold of the interior route, with the constant A carried.
The interior route's own fold stops at cgamma^{60}, because it applies its
closing numerical step in cgamma; here the fold is left at
200 A^4 cgamma^{64}, which is what a caller with a constant in the per-depth
input needs. Unconditional beyond hD.
The composite #
The Besov envelope of Step 2 on the interior mesh, from a depth input carrying a constant.
The mirror of
Closure.GammaTenStripEnvelope.exists_besovEnvelope_interiorMesoCubeGrid_of_depth_gridRoot
whose per-depth input is A cgamma^{16} (1+i) 3^{-i} and whose conclusion is
the caller's own budget c, the two being tied by the explicit numerical
premise hbudget : 200 A^4 cgamma^{64} <= c^4.
on the scale bookkeeping, the boundary gate hsmall, the budget premise, the
three cellwise typing binders and hdepth.