LocalizationOscillationEndpointSixteen #
Ported from scottnarmstrong/Superdiffusion at 7f20476385d4af418f110303085ad0740c9eba46. Module imports, support namespace and local option directives adapted for Lean Pool.
e.lower.bound.oscillations at the interior mesh, one power of gamma sharper #
LocalizationOscillationEndpoint proves the interior-mesh endpoint of
e.lower.bound.oscillations at gamma^{15}, the manuscript's own exponent.
The transport of that endpoint from the interior meso grid to the full
mesh costs a boundary remainder, so the interior half has to be delivered with
one power of gamma to spare if the sum is to stay below gamma^{15}.
This module supplies that sharper interior endpoint. Nothing in the proved
gamma^{15} route is edited: the sharpening is a re-instantiation of the
same three inputs
LocalizationOscillationDisplay.exists_freshShell*_gradient_oscillation_lower_bound_display,LocalizationEnvelopeWire.exists_freshShell_gridFourthMoment_mesoWindowEnergy_le_wired,
exists_gamma0_integrable_freshShell*_meshEnergyCell_rpow_four,
at the same explicit threshold
min gcell (min (1/4) (min genv (min 3^{-(d+3)} (1/(1+Ctot))))).
Where the spare power comes from #
LocalizationOscillationBudget.three_term_budget_le collapses the display's
three terms to Ctot gamma^{31} and then uses hfinal : Ctot gamma^{16} <= 1
to land on gamma^{15}. But the threshold that produces hfinal is gamma <= 1/(1 + Ctot), which gives Ctot gamma <= 1 outright; since gamma <= 1, it
gives Ctot gamma^k <= 1 for every k >= 1, in particular for k = 15.
That is the slack the module docstring of the proved endpoint does not use: the
1/(1+Ctot) factor in its min is one power stronger than the gamma^{15}
conclusion needs.
three_term_budget_le_mul below is the proved collapse stopped one step
earlier, at Ctot gamma^{31}; three_term_budget_le_sixteen is the k = 15
instance of the last step. The proved three_term_budget_le is the k = 16
instance and is untouched.
What is proved #
three_term_budget_le_mul-- the three-term collapse, atCtot gamma^{31}.three_term_budget_le_sixteen-- itsgamma^{16}form.exists_gamma0_freshShellDirichlet_meshOscillation_le_gamma_pow_sixteenand its Neumann mirror -- the interior endpoint atgamma^{16}. Statement, binders and threshold are those of the proved..._fifteenpair, with15replaced by16in the conclusion and nothing else changed.
Binders #
Verbatim those of LocalizationOscillationEndpoint: hd, the model gate
M.gamma <= gamma0, the induction state, the four source gates 0 < h,
m - h <= m0, h <= 6 cstar gamma^{-1}, 10^10 gamma^{-1} <= K - m, the two
direction bounds, the base point z0, and the corrector family with the weak
formulation of e.def.w. No sample-space binder survives, for the same
reason as there.
Scope #
There is no sorry.
References #
- ABK26,
e.lower.bound.oscillations,e.recurrence.params,e.def.w.
The three-term collapse, stopped one step earlier #
The three surviving terms of e.lower.bound.oscillations, at
Ctot gamma^{31}. This is LocalizationOscillationBudget.three_term_budget_le
with its last step -- the absorption of Ctot into a power of gamma --
removed, so that the caller may choose which power to land on.
: purely on the displayed numeric hypotheses; no model, field or measure occurs.
The gamma^{16} form of the three-term collapse. Identical to
LocalizationOscillationBudget.three_term_budget_le except that the absorption
gate is Ctot gamma^{15} <= 1 and the conclusion is gamma^{16}.
The two sharpened endpoints #
e.lower.bound.oscillations for the Dirichlet corrector of e.def.w, at the
recurrence parameters, below gamma^{16}.
Statement, binders and threshold are those of
exists_gamma0_freshShellDirichlet_meshOscillation_le_gamma_pow_fifteen; only
the conclusion's exponent changes.