EdBridgeStepFour #
Ported from scottnarmstrong/Superdiffusion at 7f20476385d4af418f110303085ad0740c9eba46. Module imports, support namespace and local option directives adapted for Lean Pool.
The anchored one-step delivered in the Step-4 / IterationDecay slot #
The anchored interior one-step is the printed one-step contraction
with the harmonic-approximation anchor's four legs on the right.
t.regularity Step 4 and the frozen iteration anchor's own hypothesis
e.Ej.decay.assumption (named IterationDecay by the Step-5 provider) want
instead
E(u, U_{j-h}) ≤ θ^h E(u, U_j) + ε_j |∇ℓ_j| + δ_j , U_j = (z+□_j) ∩ □_m , θ = 3^{-1/4} .
This module performs that conversion — residues 1--4 — on the interior branch.
Residue 3: the W' → U_0 window move, measured and closed at zero new analysis #
In the proved indices the gap is exactly one triadic scale: the one-step at
scale n carries all four legs on (z+□_{n+1}) ∩ □_m and its supply event at
index n+1 (the frozen statement's anchor is z-centred at its own index +3, two
scales above the print's x-centred +1), while its contraction reads the
excess at (z+□_n) ∩ □_m.
The move is therefore not an analytic comparison of two incomparable windows: it is a
re-index. Running the one-step at x := z and reading the conclusion at j := n+1,
- the anchor's legs sit on
U_{n+1} = U_j— the recursion's own window, where residue 2 applies verbatim, and the supply event sits at indexj, which is exactly the index of the Step-3 bad set𝓑_z = {j : 𝒢(j,z;·) fails}; - the contraction's excess sits on
U_n = U_{j-1}, one scale below, and is moved up by the proved excess quasi-monotonicityE(u,U_n) ≤ κ(d,1) E(u,U_{n+1})(OneStepWindows.affineExcess_truncatedWindow_le, a pure volume-ratio bound), whose constant is absorbed into the contraction by residue 4; - the left-hand window sits on
U_{n-k} = U_{j-h}ath := k+1.
This module is the general-clause route, kept because it needs no
frontier-empty gate (hence covers the windows that meet ∂□_m, where the
boundary join lives).
What is discharged, and what is carried #
Discharged inside: the anchor, the good-event cap
(OneStepGoodScales.ae_errorRepresentative_le_goodEventDeltaSlot), the
oscillation-to-excess fold, the window move, the contraction absorption, and
the almost-sure quantifier over the whole scale range (ae_all_iff over ℤ,
so that ONE ω serves every scale — what a pathwise bad set needs).
Carried, as source binders: the Dirichlet datum and clause-(iv) MemLp data of
the one-step; the harmonic replacement v, w on the moved cube at each scale
(the reflection chain plus the Weyl
representative produce them with no analytic input); the affine minimizer at
the scale in question; the interior gate (z+□_{n-2}) ⊆ □_m; and one smallness
gate on δ.
The δ-gate (disclosed) #
Printed Step 4 absorbs the one-step's second E-coefficient into 3^{-k/4} by
the two inequalities (C s^{-3/2} 3^{-k/4} ≤ 1/2 and ε_j(z) ≤ ½ s^{3/2} C^{-1} 3^{-k/4}). Here that absorption is a single explicit hypothesis
hgate: the capped leg constant times s^{-3} δ^{1/2} is at most ½ · 3^{-(k+1)/4}.
References #
- ABK26,
l.excess.decay.good.scales;t.regularitySteps 3--5;l.iteration.lemma.
1. The bridge's constants and legs #
The bridge's ε_j at j = n+1: the printed ε_j at
the ε-re-pin s^{-4}, with the error representative left (uncapped),
exactly as t.regularity Step 5's own ε_j(z) is.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
2. The scalar recombination #
** residue 3, atom: the one-scale excess move.** E(u,U_n) ≤ κ(d,1) E(u,U_{n+1}) on the Step-3 window family, at the proved volume-ratio constant.