Documentation

LeanPool.Superdiffusion.Algsuperdiff.Section4.Provider.ExcessDecay.OneStepTriangle

OneStepTriangle #

Ported from scottnarmstrong/Superdiffusion at 7f20476385d4af418f110303085ad0740c9eba46. Module imports, support namespace and local option directives adapted for Lean Pool.

The excess algebra of the one-step contraction #

The two purely definitional children of l.excess.decay.good.scales:

Two disclosed deviations from the printed displays #

  1. The subadditivity carrier. The tree's proved subadditivity (BoundaryLaneExcess.affineExcessRaw_add_le) is unusable from this module: BoundaryLaneExcess and SandwichNondegeneracyAttainment both declare normalizedL2On_le_of_abs_le in the same namespace, so they cannot be imported together, and the excess-geometry lane needs the latter. The subadditivity is therefore re-proved here from Minkowski (normalizedL2On_add_le) under the disclosing name affineExcessRaw_add_le_of_memLp, with the affine MemLp slot explicit.
  2. The constant of the oscillation fold. ABK26 prints 3^{-n}‖u-(u)_{U_0}‖ ≤ E(u,U_0) + C|∇ℓ_0|, i.e. the constant on the slope only. The proved endpoint comparison charges one constant to both summands: osc ≤ endpointConst d (1/9) · (E + |∇ℓ|). That is weaker than print on the excess leg, and it is what is stated here. (The printed constant already hides a window-geometry fact, not "the triangle inequality" alone.)

1. Affine competitors are square-integrable on a truncated window #

2. Subadditivity of the raw excess #

Subadditivity of the raw excess, re-proved from Minkowski with the affine MemLp slot explicit (see deviation 1 in the module docstring).

3. The triangle step at the |W|^{-1/d} normalizer #

The triangle assembly, the comparison step.

E(u,W) ≤ E(v,W) + 9·3^{-k}·‖u-v‖_{L²(W)} on the truncated window W = (x+□_k) ∩ □_m; the factor 9 is the aspect-1/9 slack of the truncated normalizer against the cube normalizer 3^{-k}.

4. The window transfer of the L² remainder #

The volume-ratio transfer. Passing ‖f‖_{L²} from the outer window U_l down to the inner window U_k (k ≤ l) costs (3^{l-k+2})^{d/2}. This is the 3^{(d/2+1)k} bookkeeping, with the +2 coming from the truncated window's own aspect ratio.

5. The oscillation-to-excess fold #

Existence of an affine minimizer on a truncated window (the source's ℓ(u,W)), from the proved sandwich attainment.