StepSevenCaccGradient #
Ported from scottnarmstrong/Superdiffusion at 7f20476385d4af418f110303085ad0740c9eba46. Module imports, support namespace and local option directives adapted for Lean Pool.
t.regularity Step 7c: e.gradient.with.shom #
The target #
ν^{1/2}‖∇u‖_{L²((z+□_{n+1}) ∩ □_m)}
≤ C σ_{n'}^{1/2} 3^{(3/4)(1-α)(m-n)} 3^{-(m'-1)}
‖u - (u)_{(z+□_{m'-1})∩□_m}‖_{L²((z+□_{m'-1})∩□_m)}
+ C 3^{(3/4)(1-α)(m-n)} 3^{m/2} ( σ_m^{-1/2}[𝐠]_{W^{1/2,∞}(□_m)}
+ σ_m^{1/2}‖∇h‖_{W^{1/2,∞}(□_m)} 1_{z ∉ □_{m-1}} ) ,
C = C(d, c_*), and 3/4 = 1/4 (volume) + 1/2 (Hölder).
The scalar carriers #
Following's StepSixHolderExponent, the step is proved on the S the display
names, so that the composition is a theorem about the two exponents and nothing
else:
gradLoc—ν^{1/2}‖∇u‖_{L²((z+□_{n+1})∩□_m)}: for𝐚_L = ν I + 𝐤with𝐤antisymmetric this is the symmetric coefficient energy, so the reading is literally the manuscript's quantity.gradCore— the same energy on the Caccioppoli coreU_{n'-2}.volFac—3^{(d/2)(n'-n)}, discharged here against the Step-3 budget and theC₁floor.lamLo—Λ_{1/4,2}(z + □_{n'}; 𝐚_{L,n'}), the Caccioppoli's ellipticity coefficient.shomNp—σ_{n'}.oscLo—3^{-n'}‖u - (u)_{U_{n'}}‖_{L²(U_{n'})}.oscHi—3^{-(m'-1)}‖u - (u)_{U_{m'-1}}‖_{L²(U_{m'-1})}.dataOsc— Step 6's OWN data leg,3^{m/2}(σ_m^{-1}[𝐠]_{W^{1/2,∞}(□_m)} + ‖∇h‖_{W^{1/2,∞}(□_m)}1_{z∉□_{m-1}}).dataM— the Caccioppoli's own data leg at scalen', aftere.lambda.stability.applied.
The three conditional inputs, and nothing else #
The display-named theorems carry exactly three conditional inputs:
hcacc—l.coarse.grained.Caccioppoli.RHSapplied at the good scalen', in square-root (energy-norm) form. See that module.hlambda—e.lambda.stability.applied, the upper leg atk' = n':Λ_{1/4,2}(z+□_{n'};𝐚_{L,n'})1_{G} ≤ C σ_{n'}.hosc—e.oscillation.Holder.boundat scalen', in exactly the shapeoscillationHolderBound_of_iterationResultproduces.
Everything else is discharged: the volume factor's budget arithmetic
(StepSevenCaccVolume), the exponent addition 1/4 + 1/2 = 3/4, and the
R₂ ≥ 1 monotonicity that lets the Caccioppoli's own data leg ride the same
power of three.
References #
- ABK26,
e.gradient.with.shom. - ABK26,
e.oscillation.Holder.bound;e.lambda.stability.applied.
1. The composition core #
The Step-7c composition, on abstract reals.
From the four ingredients
gradLoc ≤ volFac · gradCore (the volume half)
volFac ≤ Cvol · R₁ (the budget, StepSevenCaccVolume)
gradCore ≤ Ccacc·(√lamLo · oscLo) + Ccacc·dataM (hcacc)
lamLo ≤ Clam · shomNp (hlambda)
oscLo ≤ Cosc·R₂·oscHi + Cosc·R₂·dataOsc (hosc)
together with 1 ≤ R₂, the display follows at the single output constant Cvol · Ccacc · (Cosc·√Clam + 1) and the single power R₁·R₂. Every step is a
product of nonnegative reals; no transcendental atom occurs.
2. e.gradient.with.shom #
3^{c₁ t} · 3^{c₂ t} = 3^{(c₁+c₂) t} at the Step-6 exponent argument.
e.gradient.with.shom, as printed.
The Caccioppoli at the lowest good scale n', the Hölder bound at that same
scale, and the volume factor, composed. The exponent is the printed `3/4 = 1/4
- 1/2`.
The data bracket is the honest σ_{n'}^{1/2}·dataOsc + dataM; see the module
docstring for the (separately proved) collapse to the printed
3^{m/2}(σ_m^{-1/2}[𝐠] + σ_m^{1/2}‖∇h‖1).
hcacc, hlambda, hosc are the only conditional inputs.