Section 11.2, part 2c: prop:base, statement and assembly #
This file was automatically generated by Claude.
Formalization of blueprint Section 11, "The base reduction" (sec:base), subsection 2, "Adaptive
fits and the two earliest increments", part 2c: prop:base, statement and assembly: sizes, triple
tail, active cells (lines 1600-1623, 1643-1660) (lines 1598-1666) of
blueprint/formalization_blueprint.tex.
Pair smallness bounds a four-slot form by the exact sizes of its two spectators.
The input has finite normalized L² norm on every tree cell (only the root normalization is
used).
The physical fine projections have finite normalized L² norm on every cell.
Changing the slot-a input of slots4 almost everywhere on the cell does not change the
form.
The delayed replacement of one high input on an accurate-fit root #
The accurate-fit setup of the high slot a over the predictor system of the low lists
(blueprint prop:base, lines 1626 and 1634).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Blueprint prop:base, proof lines 1626-1641: on the segment of an accurate-fit root K, the
input in slot a is replaced by the delayed physical projection of the accurate-fit system, with
the absolute scale-sum error of lem:predictors and lem:delay.
Opponent algebra for the replaced tuple #
Discarding the opponent on some cells keeps it admissible.
Changing the opponent slot of slots4 almost everywhere on the cell does not change the
form.
Linearity in slot a: subtracting a common term.
The delayed projection of a path-uniform column system, discarded on cells too deep for the delay, is an admissible opponent with depth energy one on every tree cell below the root of its family (blueprint lem:delay, sequential replacement).