Theorem thm:max_lh: the maximum leaf-height #
Source: statement lines 533–586, proof lines 3253–3387 (inventory T1.4, P24). Marks
G_k(T) = 1{λ_∅(T) ≥ k}, raw counts N_k(T) = ∑_{v ∈ T} G_k(T_v) (markCount), declumped marks
Ghat_k = RootDeclumping.lhDeclumpedMark μ k (degree set B = {j ≥ κ + 1}), π_k = P(λ_∅(𝒯) ≥ k),
c = 1 - κ μ_κ (LeafHeight.cConst μ). The cutoff is M_n = max 1 ⌊n^{1-η}⌋₊ with
η = (1 - 1/α)/2 ∈ (0, 1 - 1/α).
The final theorem takes Theorems thm:PoissonApproximation2 and thm:max_string (the paper's own
results, proved elsewhere) as hypotheses of their reviewed statement types:
maxLeafHeight_of_approx2_maxString : PoissonApproximation2Statement → MaxStringStatement → MaxLeafHeightStatement, andmaxLeafHeight_of, the same with an (unused) extra hypothesisPoissonApproximationStatement.
The three cases are separate exports:
maxLeafHeight_unary((i),μ_1 > 0, source lines 3298–3326):C_μ = leafC μ; the levelsh_n = ⌊k_n^* + t⌋ + 1satisfy (S) (Applications.lem_S_lh, levels fromExtremesAnalysis.lh_unary_inputs), the declumped marks satisfy (C) (Applications.lem_C_lh),n π_{h_n}is bounded, so Theoremthm:PoissonApproximation2gives the declumped Poisson approximation with parameterc_B n π_{h_n},c_B = 1 - μ_1; the leaf-height marks propagate through parents of degree1(propagatesOutside_of_kappa_eq_one), the root mark vanishes (Bridge.conditioned_mark_tendsto_zero), and Lemmalem:declump_to_raw(PlaneTree.conditioned_declump_to_raw) transfers toP(N_{h_n}(𝒯^n) = 0) = P(λ(𝒯^n) ≤ ⌊k_n^* + t⌋).maxLeafHeight_superexp_of_cConst_pos((ii),μ_1 = 0,c > 0, source lines 3328–3383):eq:threshold_lhistendsto_conditioned_le_leafHeight_zero(first moment, Corollarycor:SM(ii), Markov) andtendsto_conditioned_le_leafHeight_one(Theoremthm:PoissonApproximation2, divergent part, andN̂_h ≥ 1 ⇒ N_h ≥ 1 ⇔ λ ≥ h); these are the two halves of Lemmalem:ineqs, proved here directly for the conditioned laws (probability measures only at admissible sizes). The levels and the thresholds are those ofExtremesAnalysis.lh_twoPoint_thresholdsandExtremesAnalysis.lh_interior_thresholds.maxLeafHeight_of_cConst_eq_zero((ii),c = 0, source lines 3274–3296):λ = H_κalmost surely under𝒯^nandk_n^{**} = t_n^{**}(ExtremesAnalysis.lh_center_eq_tStarStar), so the claim is Theoremthm:max_string(ii) withr = κ.
Departures #
- The paper's case split at
θ_n = 1/2is replaced by the single lower levelExtremesAnalysis.twoPointLow k_n^{**}(J_n = [a_n, a_n + 2)), and integer levels are turned into natural mark indices byInt.toNat({H ≤ m} = {(m+1).toNat ≤ H}ᶜfor every integerm), so negative floors and smallnneed no separate treatment. - Theorem
thm:PoissonApproximationis not needed: Theoremthm:PoissonApproximation2(with Lemmalem:declump_to_rawin case (i)) covers both the bounded and the divergent regime.
Markov's inequality for a count under the conditioned law (any n):
P(N(𝒯^n) ≥ 1) ≤ E[N(𝒯^n)].
Along admissibleSizes μ, the sizes are eventually admissible.
Upper half of eq:threshold_lh (source lines 3343–3356): under (S) along the levels h_n,
n π_{h_n} → 0 implies P(λ(𝒯^n) ≥ h_n) → 0 (Corollary cor:SM(ii) and the first half of
Lemma lem:ineqs, i.e. Markov's inequality for N_{h_n}(𝒯^n)).
Lower half of eq:threshold_lh (source lines 3343–3356): if c > 0, under (S) along the
levels h_n, n π_{h_n} → ∞ implies P(λ(𝒯^n) ≥ h_n) → 1 (Theorem thm:PoissonApproximation2,
divergent part, gives N̂_{h_n}(𝒯^n) → ∞ in probability, with (C) from Lemma lem:C_lh; then
the second half of Lemma lem:ineqs, since N̂_h ≥ 1 ⇒ N_h ≥ 1 ⇔ λ ≥ h).
Two thresholds give the localization on [lo, hi): if P(H(𝒯^n) ≥ lo_n) → 1 and
P(H(𝒯^n) ≥ hi_n) → 0, then P(lo_n ≤ H(𝒯^n) < hi_n) → 1.
Propagation for κ = 1 (source lines 3317–3319): with B = {j ≥ 2}, a vertex with a child
U with λ_∅(U) ≥ k and degree outside B has degree one, hence λ_∅ ≥ k + 1 ≥ k.
Theorem thm:max_lh(i) (source lines 536–543, 562–566; proof 3298–3326): if μ_1 > 0,
C_μ = lim P(λ_∅(𝒯) ≥ j)/μ_1^j > 0 exists, and with
k_n^* = (log n + log((1 - μ_1) C_μ))/log(1/μ_1), for every real t,
P(λ(𝒯^n) ≤ ⌊k_n^* + t⌋) - exp(-μ_1^{t + 1 - {k_n^* + t}}) → 0 along admissible sizes.
Theorem thm:max_lh(ii), case c = 1 - κ μ_κ > 0 (source lines 545–558; proof
3328–3383): for μ_1 = 0 and k_n^{**} = log_κ log n - log_κ log(1/D_μ),
P(λ(𝒯^n) ∈ J_n) → 1, and P(λ(𝒯^n) = ⌊k_n^{**}⌋) → 1 in the interior phase.
Theorem thm:max_lh(ii), case c = 0 (source lines 3274–3296): the law is supported
on {0, κ}, λ = H_κ almost surely and k_n^{**} = t_n^{**}, so this is Theorem
thm:max_string(ii) with r = κ.
Theorem thm:max_lh (source lines 533–586), from Theorems thm:PoissonApproximation2 and
thm:max_string.
Theorem thm:max_lh, from Theorems thm:PoissonApproximation2 and thm:max_string as
hypotheses (the unconditional form is PoissonDeclumping.maxLeafHeight). Theorem
thm:PoissonApproximation is not used (the proof goes through Theorem
thm:PoissonApproximation2 and Theorem thm:max_string).